If --ippserver is specified, output of get-printer-attributes request
from ipptool is created in format compatible with ippeveprinter printer
application, which helps during debugging.
The content in page "Creating RPM Packages"
has been subsumed under "Package Tutorial: GNU Hello"
in the Package Maintainer Docs.
Thus, the page is removed
and all references to it are pointed to the Packaging Tutorial.
"Creating RPM Packages" has one subpage,
which is moved to a top-level page.
In a separate commit for the Package Maintainer Docs,
the url of "Creating RPM Packages" will be listed as an alias
of the "Package Tutorial" so that external links will keep working.
* Migrate some of the content from the old "Bugs and Feature Requests" wiki page
* Add cross references to places that have additional info
* Add a table of contents because gee whiz this page is big
* Encourage people to go to Ask Fedora first, in the hopes that the issue gets solved there and we don't end up with bugs that will just sit until EOL closure.
The GNU Hello packaging tutorial
has been imported to the Package Maintainer Docs.
It has also received a major update,
bringing it up to date with current Fedora practices.
The copy in Quick Docs is replaced with a link to the new page.
Following the upstream documentation for systemd network target:
https://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/NetworkTarget/
It is not supposed to be used as an active unit and it cannot be started
directly. Quote from the website:
Note that network.target is a passive unit: you cannot start it directly
and it is not pulled in by any services that want to make use of the
network. Instead, it is pulled in by the network management service
itself. Services using the network should hence simply place an
After=network.target dependency in their unit files, and avoid any
Wants=network.target or even Requires=network.target.
This patch changes the documentation to follow the upstream
recommendation.
- Place a large caution box at the top of the file, warning
users of the outdated information on the page and directing
them to the more current "Using firewalld" quick doc.
- Drop the second and third iptables section partials entirely,
as it's been years since either 'system-config-firewall' or
'system-config-firewall-tui' has been available in the repos.
Locally it rendered for me with the title of the target document, however when
deployed it rendered with the filename of the target document. So include the
document titles explicitly instead.
* Improve messaging regarding N->N+2 upgrades.
* Move some details regarding Rawhide issues to the specific Rawhide wiki page.
This generic guide doesn't need to go into detail about Rawhide issues,
because that makes it harder to read for general users (not interested in
Rawhide). Power users can follow a link.
* Update gnome-software screenshot (more recent, with graphics).
* Clearly state that upgrading using pure `dnf` or `fedora-upgrade` is
unsupported.
* Other small adjustments and clarifications, link fixes. Make section headlines
look consistent across articles (don't capitalize every word).
The current version of the page includes hardcoded, obsolete references
to e.g. Fedora 28, 30, and 31, which can be confusing.
Replace references with attributes, and add a new one, `{NEXTNEXTVER}`
for the branched example.
Signed-off-by: Michel Alexandre Salim <salimma@fedoraproject.org>
The virtio-win docs are out of date, and soon to be even more so with
coming upstream changes to the yum repo. Upstream devs would like to
move the docs closer to the upstream project infrastructure.
Delete most of the content and point at the upstream packaging README.md
https://pagure.io/fedora-docs/quick-docs/issue/327
Signed-off-by: Cole Robinson <crobinso@redhat.com>
Added sudo to lines where needed
Changed "apachectl reload" to "sudo systemctl reload httpd.service"
Added / to the end of /etc/httpd/conf.d
Technical review completed and is now accurate.
Why this change is needed:
With the new default system in BTRF as Defautl for new instalation
this procedure needs updated.
What this change accomplishes:
. Reflect the diferences between rescue a system in a LVM/BTRF file System.
. Remove Sequence Number Warninig in a debug-dracut-problems.adoc
fix ticket: #316
Note: Please don't push .adoc with Warning Messages is quite anoying
What this change accomplishes:
1. Move PostgreSql to Database Section
2. Remove Tips and Trips in PostgreSQL and move to the following
3. Add manage-sql-server.adoc and add GUI for Mysql/MariaDB/PostgreSQL
4. Add install information phpPgadmin because in fedora 33 is out of repo.
This is now the second time when rpmconf reverted me
google-chrome-stable.repo file back to version where I have `enabled=0`.
It looks like this package generates the repo file in the post scriplet
and does not mention it in the list of installed files, this probably
tricks rpmconf to do an incorrect action. I would love to investigate
further and maybe file a bug for chrome/chromium, but now that I
finished my upgrade I can't look back why rpmconf thought this file
needs updating - scriplet looks like this:
YUM_REPO_FILE="/etc/yum.repos.d/google-chrome.repo"
install_yum() {
install_rpm_key
if [ ! "$REPOCONFIG" ]; then
return 0
fi
if [ -d "/etc/yum.repos.d" ]; then
cat > "$YUM_REPO_FILE" << REPOCONTENT
[google-chrome]
name=google-chrome
baseurl=$REPOCONFIG/$DEFAULT_ARCH
enabled=1
gpgcheck=1
gpgkey=https://dl.google.com/linux/linux_signing_key.pub
REPOCONTENT
fi
}
It was likely some older version of the package. Anyway, I thought I'd
drop a warning note for others, because I accidentally disabled this
repo which left my Chrome on an old version for about a year until it
websites started warning me about an unsupported version. This is
dangerous, my main browser is Firefox but this could be a security
problem for others.
Added sudo to lines where needed
Changed "apachectl reload" to "sudo systemctl reload httpd.service"
Added / to the end of /etc/httpd/conf.d
Technical review completed and is now accurate.
* Simplify list of required packages (and add `grubby`).
* Move Disabled -> Enforcing steps from `changing-to-enforcing-mode` to
`enabling-selinux`.
* In `changing-to-enforcing-mode`, use the correct procedure based on
whether SELinux is currently Permissive or Disabled.
* Add step for ensuring that filesystem is relabeled when re-enabling
SELinux.
Signed-off-by: Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@redhat.com>
The kernel functionality that allowed to disable SELinux by changing
/etc/selinux/config is now deprecated and will be removed in F34 [1].
While setting SELINUX=Disabled will still lead to a similar state even
after the removal, it is better to guide users to disable SELinux via
kernel boot parameters, which will actually disable SELinux completely
(as in no SElinux code is executed by the kernel).
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Remove_Support_For_SELinux_Runtime_Disable
Signed-off-by: Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@redhat.com>
Use "reboot" consistently, emphasize the immediate no-prompt reboot, mention it's a console terminal, then a second reboot, and clean up step 6 language. This fixes issue #294 and I think is an improvement.
This commit refactors the content for the fonts page. I focused on
organization and layout. I restructured the previous layout from a more
command line vs. GUI approach, and instead emphasized "packaged vs.
unpackaged" fonts.
I was inspired to rework this page because I went looking for it
recently, and the search engine led me here. :-)
Signed-off-by: Justin W. Flory (he/him) <git@jwf.io>
This commit renames the "Adding new fonts in Fedora" file name. This
is done for two reasons:
1. Ensures the following changes are easier to review commit-by-commit
2. Better optimization in URL for search engines (i.e. this page is
about fonts, so using a single word in the URL optimizes for that
specific keyword)
Signed-off-by: Justin W. Flory (he/him) <git@jwf.io>
