mirror of
https://pagure.io/fedora-docs/quick-docs.git
synced 2024-11-28 06:54:52 +00:00
286 lines
13 KiB
Text
286 lines
13 KiB
Text
= Red Hat Enterprise Linux
|
|
|
|
'''
|
|
|
|
[NOTE]
|
|
======
|
|
|
|
This page was automatically converted from https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux
|
|
|
|
It is probably
|
|
|
|
* Badly formatted
|
|
* Missing graphics and tables that do not covert well from mediawiki
|
|
* Out-of-date
|
|
* In need of other love
|
|
|
|
Please fix it, remove this notice, and then add to `_topic_map.yml`
|
|
|
|
Pull requests accepted at https://pagure.io/fedora-docs/fedora-howto
|
|
|
|
Once that is live, go to the original wiki page and add an `{{old}}`
|
|
tag, followed by a note like
|
|
|
|
....
|
|
{{admon/note|This page has a new home!|
|
|
This wiki page is no longer maintained. Please find the up-to-date
|
|
version at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/whatever-the-url
|
|
}}
|
|
....
|
|
|
|
======
|
|
|
|
'''
|
|
|
|
|
|
*Red Hat Enterprise Linux* (or RHEL) is a commercially supported
|
|
derivative of Fedora tailored to meet the requirements of enterprise
|
|
customers. It is a commercial product from Red Hat which also sponsors
|
|
Fedora as a community project. Fedora is upstream for Red Hat Enterprise
|
|
Linux but there are several other link:Derived_distributions[Derived
|
|
distributions] available too.
|
|
|
|
[[whats-the-difference-between-fedora-and-red-hat-enterprise-linux]]
|
|
What's the difference between Fedora and Red Hat Enterprise Linux?
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
Watch a video from
|
|
http://www.redhatmagazine.com/2008/09/16/video-the-history-of-fedora/[Red
|
|
Hat Magazine].
|
|
|
|
Both Fedora and Red Hat Enterprise Linux are open source. Fedora is a
|
|
free distribution and community project and upstream for Red Hat
|
|
Enterprise Linux. Fedora is a general purpose system that gives Red Hat
|
|
and the rest of its contributor community the chance to innovate rapidly
|
|
with new technologies. Red Hat Enterprise Linux is a commercial
|
|
enterprise operating system and has its own set of test phases including
|
|
alpha and beta releases which are separate and distinct from Fedora
|
|
development.
|
|
|
|
The cost of Red Hat Enterprise Linux comes from the subscription, which
|
|
provides assorted certifications and support for additional
|
|
architectures, as well as 7 years and more of enterprise support. Red
|
|
Hat also enhances its Red Hat Enterprise Linux offerings with additional
|
|
software and with certification programs.
|
|
|
|
More information on the release history and lineage is available at
|
|
link:History_of_Red_Hat_Linux[History of Red Hat Linux].
|
|
|
|
When you purchase Red Hat Enterprise Linux, you are also helping to
|
|
support Fedora. Since Red Hat sponsors Fedora, what is good for Red Hat
|
|
is usually good for Fedora. The major differences are:
|
|
|
|
* Support and associated services: Red Hat Enterprise Linux is a
|
|
commercially supported product by Red Hat and provides service level
|
|
agreements that is important for enterprise customers. This support
|
|
involves both product assistance (hand holding) as well as
|
|
prioritization of bug fixes and feature requests, certified hardware and
|
|
software among other things. Fedora is supported by a wide community of
|
|
developers and users but it is not commercially supported by Red Hat.
|
|
Red Hat does http://fedoraproject.org/sponsors[sponsor] a large number
|
|
of resources and link:Accounting[ funds] to the Fedora project including
|
|
engineering, marketing and other services.
|
|
|
|
* link:LifeCycle[Lifecycle]: A new version of Red Hat Enterprise Linux
|
|
comes out every few years and is supported for up to 10 years and can
|
|
even be
|
|
http://www.redhat.com/rhel/server/extended_lifecycle_support/[extended]
|
|
to 13 years or more with additional subscriptions. New Fedora releases
|
|
are available about every six months and every release gets updates for
|
|
about 13 months.
|
|
|
|
* Software Packages: Software in Red Hat Enterprise Linux is a limited
|
|
subset of Fedora and has about 4000 binary packages (RHEL 6). These are
|
|
the ones enterprise customers demand and are supported by Red Hat.
|
|
Fedora offers a wide range of software packages and the latest release
|
|
has well over 25000 unique (not counting updates in Fedora 15) binary
|
|
software packages available in the repository.
|
|
|
|
* Software Updates: Post release updates of software in Red Hat
|
|
Enterprise Linux are usually limited to backported security and bug
|
|
fixes, although enhancements are also offered usually via the major
|
|
scheduled updates. Red Hat also offers
|
|
http://www.press.redhat.com/2008/12/18/red-hat-increases-service-levels-and-reduces-costs-for-customers-with-extended-update-support/[extended
|
|
update support] for customers wishing to stick to a single point release
|
|
for a longer amount of time. Red Hat also aims to provide ABI
|
|
compatibility within a release, whereas this is not guaranteed by the
|
|
Fedora Project. Fedora software packages and updates are close to
|
|
link:Staying_close_to_upstream_projects[ upstream] and include new
|
|
features routinely.
|
|
|
|
* New Releases: Subscriptions are for a specified time period and not
|
|
for a particular release. So you can move to any currently supported
|
|
release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux including new versions of RHEL
|
|
|
|
Red Hat has a page explaining the benefits of the
|
|
https://www.redhat.com/rhel/benefits/[subscription] in more detail. It
|
|
also provides https://www.redhat.com/software/rhelorfedora/[an older
|
|
comparison between the two options].
|
|
|
|
[[what-about-packages-not-part-of-red-hat-enterprise-linux-what-is-epel]]
|
|
What about packages not part of Red Hat Enterprise Linux? What is EPEL?
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
In order to focus Red Hat's efforts and limit support costs, only a
|
|
selected subset of packages found in Fedora are included in the
|
|
commercially supported product line. The Fedora Project has a community
|
|
of people maintaining add-on packages for Red Hat Enterprise Linux and
|
|
compatible rebuilds called link:EPEL[Extra Packages for Enterprise
|
|
Linux], or EPEL.
|
|
|
|
[[what-is-the-release-cycle-of-red-hat-enterprise-linux]]
|
|
What is the release cycle of Red Hat Enterprise Linux?
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
There is no fixed release schedule for new releases. Red Hat Enterprise
|
|
Linux is usually released approximately every 18 to 36 months and each
|
|
release is http://www.redhat.com/security/updates/errata/[maintained for
|
|
7 years] and can be
|
|
http://www.redhat.com/rhel/server/extended_lifecycle_support/[extended]
|
|
up to 10 years. Red Hat also offers
|
|
http://www.press.redhat.com/2008/12/18/red-hat-increases-service-levels-and-reduces-costs-for-customers-with-extended-update-support/[extended
|
|
update support] for customers wishing to stick to a single point release
|
|
for a longer amount of time.
|
|
|
|
[[what-is-the-update-policy-for-red-hat-enterprise-linux]]
|
|
What is the update policy for Red Hat Enterprise Linux?
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
Red Hat Enterprise Linux updates are more conservative and generally
|
|
focus on security and bug fixes . Hardware enablement and targeted
|
|
enhancements are delivered via scheduled minor updates and the policy is
|
|
described in much more detail
|
|
https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/errata/[here]
|
|
|
|
Fedora's Updates_Policy is more liberal compared to Red Hat Enterprise
|
|
Linux.
|
|
|
|
[[is-red-hat-enterprise-linux-available-for-free-or-low-cost]]
|
|
Is Red Hat Enterprise Linux available for free or low cost?
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
It is a commercial product and not available for free. There is a
|
|
evaluation version for free download at
|
|
https://www.redhat.com/rhel/details/eval/ and a version targeted at
|
|
developers for 99$ at
|
|
|
|
https://www.redhat.com/apps/store/developers/rhel_developer_suite.html
|
|
|
|
Academic editions are available at a low cost as well
|
|
|
|
http://www.redhat.com/solutions/education/academic/
|
|
|
|
http://www.redhat.com/solutions/education/academic/individual/
|
|
|
|
[[is-red-hat-enterprise-linux-a-open-source-product]]
|
|
Is Red Hat Enterprise Linux a open source product?
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
Yes. Binaries and updates are part of the
|
|
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/selling.html[commercial] subscription from
|
|
Red Hat to its customers. The complete source code in the form of source
|
|
RPM's is available publicly at Red Hat's
|
|
ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/[ftp mirror], which is
|
|
above and beyond the requirements of any of the free and open source
|
|
licenses. Red Hat participates in the CentOS project and the sources are
|
|
available from
|
|
http://community.redhat.com/centos-faq/#_git_centos_org[their] site as
|
|
well. Red Hat also provides a complementary repository containing small
|
|
number of additional packages which are licensed from its partners under
|
|
different licensing terms.
|
|
|
|
[[is-it-possible-to-use-the-publicly-available-source-rpms-to-rebuild-the-distribution]]
|
|
Is it possible to use the publicly available source RPMs to rebuild the
|
|
distribution?
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
Absolutely. All the SRPMS are under free and open source licenses that
|
|
permit this. There are several such rebuilds and derivatives of Red Hat
|
|
Enterprise Linux available. http://centos.org[CentOS] and
|
|
https://www.scientificlinux.org/[Scientific Linux] are popular ones.
|
|
|
|
[[whats-the-difference-between-rebuilds-and-red-hat-enterprise-linux]]
|
|
What's the difference between rebuilds and Red Hat Enterprise Linux ?
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
Red Hat Enterprise Linux is commercially supported by Red Hat, and
|
|
offers a range of software and hardware certifications including third
|
|
party ISV applications. Rebuilds often have a substantial
|
|
http://lwn.net/Articles/345028/[delay in releasing updates] and
|
|
especially for releasing rebuilds for
|
|
https://lwn.net/Articles/435744/[major releases] of RHEL or minor point
|
|
updates following that. Red Hat also offers other management features
|
|
via a web service called http://rhn.redhat.com[Red Hat Network] that is
|
|
not available to such rebuilds. Also, layered products such as Red Hat
|
|
Application Stack, Red Hat Directory Server and Red Hat Satellite are
|
|
only supported on top of Red Hat Enterprise Linux subscriptions. Many
|
|
hardware, software and security certifications are only valid on Red Hat
|
|
Enterprise Linux and not the rebuilds. Much of the technical content of
|
|
Red Hat http://kbase.redhat.com[knowledge base] and
|
|
http://access.redhat.com[customer support portal] is only available to
|
|
Red Hat customers as well.
|
|
|
|
[[whats-the-relationship-between-centos-and-red-hat]]
|
|
What's the relationship between CentOS and Red Hat?
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
Red Hat has explained this in detail at
|
|
http://community.redhat.com/centos-faq/
|
|
|
|
[[history]]
|
|
History
|
|
~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
Red Hat first offered an enterprise Linux support subscription for Red
|
|
Hat Linux 6.1. It was not a separate product but the subscription level
|
|
was branded as Red Hat 6.2E. Subsequently, Red Hat started creating a
|
|
separate product with commercial service level agreements and longer
|
|
lifecyle based on Red Hat Linux and later on Fedora. This was initially
|
|
called as Advanced Server and rebranded as Red Hat Enterprise Linux in
|
|
2003. The following table gives the lineage:
|
|
|
|
[cols=",,,",options="header",]
|
|
|=======================================================================
|
|
|Release |Codename |Release Date |Based on
|
|
|Red Hat Linux 6.2E |Zoot |2000-03-27 |Red Hat Linux 6.2
|
|
|
|
|Red Hat Enterprise Linux 2.1 |Pensacola (AS)/ Panama (ES) |2002-03-26
|
|
(AS) |Red Hat Linux 7.2
|
|
|
|
|Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 |Taroon |2003-10-22 |Red Hat Linux 9
|
|
|
|
|Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 |Nahant |2005-02-15 |Fedora Core 3
|
|
|
|
|Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 |Tikanga |2007-03-14 |Fedora Core 6
|
|
|
|
|Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 |Santiago |2010-11-10 |Mix of Fedora 12
|
|
Fedora 13 and several modifications
|
|
|
|
|Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 |Maipo |2014-06-10 |Primarily Fedora 19 with
|
|
several changes from 20 and later
|
|
|=======================================================================
|
|
|
|
Note that while during the release, the releases of Red Hat Enterprise
|
|
Linux have similarities to the corresponding Fedora releases, the update
|
|
cycle is very different between these distributions and hence they
|
|
diverge drastically over time. Rebuilds of Red Hat Enterprise Linux
|
|
itself such as CentOS and Scientific Linux tend to mirror it quite
|
|
closely. If you are looking for packages that are available in Fedora
|
|
but not in Red Hat Enterprise Linux, EPEL repository is a good place to
|
|
start with.
|
|
|
|
* http://www.redhat.com/rhel/
|
|
* link:Red_Hat_contributions[Red Hat contributions]
|
|
|
|
[[articles]]
|
|
Articles
|
|
^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
* http://www.redhat.com/magazine/019may06/features/fedora_rhel_1/
|
|
* http://www.redhat.com/magazine/020jun06/features/fedora_rhel_2/
|
|
* http://www.redhat.com/magazine/021jul06/features/fedora_rhel_3/
|
|
* http://www.redhat.com/magazine/022aug06/features/fedora_rhel_4/
|
|
'''
|
|
|
|
See a typo, something missing or out of date, or anything else which can be
|
|
improved? Edit this document at https://pagure.io/fedora-docs/fedora-howto.
|