https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/viewing-logs/ had
"Untitled" in the title of the webpage. I removed it from the partial
and added it to the main page, this should fix it.
Signed-off-by: JJ Asghar <awesome@ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: JJ Asghar <jjasghar@gmail.com>
What this change accomplishes:
* Ask Fedora about Java -> point out to https://ask.fedoraproject.org/en/questions/scope:all/sort:activity-desc/tags:java/page:1/ instead of https://ask.fedoraproject.org/tags/java
* Add it switch between Version
* Add Version, LTS, and Latest
* Where this premise come from? Do NOT use Oracle rpms as these are NOT compatible with fedora/openjdk packages, actually is very well compatible and works with fedora rpm format package, and I install it without any problem or message...
[Ticket: #160 ]
NOTE: I did not remove the unreviewed warning from the parent page ‘Creating and using a live installation image’ as the Live CD section has the notice ‘needs modularization’ and I was confused by what it was asking.
- Remove Caution
- Review and Check View Log Information via Systemctl
- Add Using journalctl to View Log Information for a Specific Service
- Add to know more about systemd -> understanding-and-administering-systemd
- Sections can be moved up one level replaceing rsyslog
- Improve con_viewing-logs.adoc with adding some usefull information
- Change in using nano and vim to you can use favourite text editor
- Remove rsyslog completly
- Add -b and --list-boots if the user needs flter log messages for the current boot or view old log's
- instead of using bold for commands and file/folder names, maybe make them monospace too. That does'nt work in _NOTE_
- "Using the command line to open log files in a text editor" -> "Use a text editor" as a separate section.
- Observe a Warning when editing view_log.adoc and there is a PR in ASCCIDOCTOR
https://github.com/asciidoctor/asciidoctor/issues/2855.
[Ticket: 107] - https://pagure.io/fedora-docs/quick-docs/issue/107
Unfortunately it's not moral (if even legal) to advertise a license
violation. Spotify does not allow the client application to be distributed
elsewhere than by spotify.com, this is a well-known issue over the web.
Here are the exact license terms:
http://www.spotify.com/se/legal/end-user-agreement/
This commit also fixes the RPM Fusion documentation using lpf framework
to workaround with particular issue.
(lpf is a fedora package that show the license, download and re-package
a given software).
Please also spell the project as appropriate:
- RPM Fusion (by default)
or
- rpmfusion (when space within name is not possible)
