The current version of the page includes hardcoded, obsolete references
to e.g. Fedora 28, 30, and 31, which can be confusing.
Replace references with attributes, and add a new one, `{NEXTNEXTVER}`
for the branched example.
Signed-off-by: Michel Alexandre Salim <salimma@fedoraproject.org>
The virtio-win docs are out of date, and soon to be even more so with
coming upstream changes to the yum repo. Upstream devs would like to
move the docs closer to the upstream project infrastructure.
Delete most of the content and point at the upstream packaging README.md
https://pagure.io/fedora-docs/quick-docs/issue/327
Signed-off-by: Cole Robinson <crobinso@redhat.com>
Added sudo to lines where needed
Changed "apachectl reload" to "sudo systemctl reload httpd.service"
Added / to the end of /etc/httpd/conf.d
Technical review completed and is now accurate.
Why this change is needed:
With the new default system in BTRF as Defautl for new instalation
this procedure needs updated.
What this change accomplishes:
. Reflect the diferences between rescue a system in a LVM/BTRF file System.
. Remove Sequence Number Warninig in a debug-dracut-problems.adoc
fix ticket: #316
Note: Please don't push .adoc with Warning Messages is quite anoying
Added sudo to lines where needed
Changed "apachectl reload" to "sudo systemctl reload httpd.service"
Added / to the end of /etc/httpd/conf.d
Technical review completed and is now accurate.
* Simplify list of required packages (and add `grubby`).
* Move Disabled -> Enforcing steps from `changing-to-enforcing-mode` to
`enabling-selinux`.
* In `changing-to-enforcing-mode`, use the correct procedure based on
whether SELinux is currently Permissive or Disabled.
* Add step for ensuring that filesystem is relabeled when re-enabling
SELinux.
Signed-off-by: Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@redhat.com>
The kernel functionality that allowed to disable SELinux by changing
/etc/selinux/config is now deprecated and will be removed in F34 [1].
While setting SELINUX=Disabled will still lead to a similar state even
after the removal, it is better to guide users to disable SELinux via
kernel boot parameters, which will actually disable SELinux completely
(as in no SElinux code is executed by the kernel).
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Remove_Support_For_SELinux_Runtime_Disable
Signed-off-by: Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@redhat.com>
This commit refactors the content for the fonts page. I focused on
organization and layout. I restructured the previous layout from a more
command line vs. GUI approach, and instead emphasized "packaged vs.
unpackaged" fonts.
I was inspired to rework this page because I went looking for it
recently, and the search engine led me here. :-)
Signed-off-by: Justin W. Flory (he/him) <git@jwf.io>
So that users can configure their VMs appropriately and are not caught
by surprise if they encounter driver signature errors on boot.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Locke <kevin@kevinlocke.name>
%{_bindir} etc. already starts with a slash.
There is no need to put a slash after %{buildroot}.
(Except when pointing to the literal root of the buildroot and using just "%{buildroot}/".)
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/viewing-logs/ had
"Untitled" in the title of the webpage. I removed it from the partial
and added it to the main page, this should fix it.
Signed-off-by: JJ Asghar <awesome@ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: JJ Asghar <jjasghar@gmail.com>
What this change accomplishes:
* Ask Fedora about Java -> point out to https://ask.fedoraproject.org/en/questions/scope:all/sort:activity-desc/tags:java/page:1/ instead of https://ask.fedoraproject.org/tags/java
* Add it switch between Version
* Add Version, LTS, and Latest
* Where this premise come from? Do NOT use Oracle rpms as these are NOT compatible with fedora/openjdk packages, actually is very well compatible and works with fedora rpm format package, and I install it without any problem or message...
[Ticket: #160 ]
