2017-10-26 21:20:01 +00:00
|
|
|
|
= DNF system upgrade
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
'''
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-27 20:44:00 +00:00
|
|
|
|
[IMPORTANT]
|
2017-10-26 21:20:01 +00:00
|
|
|
|
======
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This page was automatically converted from https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DNF_system_upgrade
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is probably
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Badly formatted
|
|
|
|
|
* Missing graphics and tables that do not covert well from mediawiki
|
|
|
|
|
* Out-of-date
|
|
|
|
|
* In need of other love
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please fix it, remove this notice, and then add to `_topic_map.yml`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pull requests accepted at https://pagure.io/fedora-docs/fedora-howto
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Once that is live, go to the original wiki page and add an `{{old}}`
|
|
|
|
|
tag, followed by a note like
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
....
|
|
|
|
|
{{admon/note|This page has a new home!|
|
|
|
|
|
This wiki page is no longer maintained. Please find the up-to-date
|
|
|
|
|
version at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/whatever-the-url
|
|
|
|
|
}}
|
|
|
|
|
....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
======
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
'''
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[[what-is-dnf-system-upgrade]]
|
|
|
|
|
What is DNF system upgrade?
|
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf-plugin-system-upgrade[dnf-plugin-system-upgrade]
|
|
|
|
|
is a plugin for the link:Dnf[dnf] package manager which handles system
|
|
|
|
|
upgrades. It is the recommended command line upgrade method for Fedora
|
|
|
|
|
21 and later (Except Atomic Host, which uses rpm-ostree; for that see
|
|
|
|
|
Atomic_Host_upgrade).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[[what-does-dnf-system-upgrade-do]]
|
|
|
|
|
What does DNF system upgrade do?
|
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DNF system upgrade can upgrade your system to a newer release of Fedora,
|
|
|
|
|
using a mechanism similar to that used for offline package updates. The
|
|
|
|
|
updated packages are downloaded while the system is running normally,
|
|
|
|
|
then the system reboots to a special environment (implemented as a
|
|
|
|
|
systemd target) to install them. Once installation of the updated
|
|
|
|
|
packages is complete, the system reboots again to the new Fedora
|
|
|
|
|
release.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[[how-do-i-use-it]]
|
|
|
|
|
How do I use it?
|
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. *Back up* your important data. Every system change is potentially
|
|
|
|
|
risky, be prepared. In case you update your workstation, it is also wise
|
|
|
|
|
to download a https://getfedora.org/en/workstation/[Workstation Live
|
|
|
|
|
image] and make sure your hardware (graphics card, wifi, etc) works well
|
|
|
|
|
with the latest kernel and drivers.
|
|
|
|
|
2. Update your system using the standard updater for your desktop or :
|
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
|
....
|
|
|
|
|
$ sudo dnf upgrade --refresh
|
|
|
|
|
....
|
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
|
(Don't type the `$` in these commands; that just indicates that you type
|
|
|
|
|
this at a terminal prompt as a non-root user.)
|
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
|
After updating, we recommend you reboot your computer, especially if
|
|
|
|
|
you've just installed a new kernel. +
|
|
|
|
|
* Please note that there is
|
|
|
|
|
link:Common_F23_bugs#plymouth-theme-upgrade[an issue] if you use a
|
|
|
|
|
non-default plymouth boot theme. If you do, please follow the issue
|
|
|
|
|
description to make sure your upgrade will not be affected.
|
|
|
|
|
* Double check your DNF configuration in , if you have done any custom
|
|
|
|
|
configuration (either manually or via third-party tool), it's
|
|
|
|
|
recommended to revert it to default before updating and upgrading your
|
|
|
|
|
system.
|
|
|
|
|
3. Install package:
|
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
|
....
|
|
|
|
|
$ sudo dnf install dnf-plugin-system-upgrade
|
|
|
|
|
....
|
|
|
|
|
4. Download the updated packages: \{\{#tag:pre|$ sudo dnf
|
|
|
|
|
system-upgrade download --refresh --releasever=}} Change the
|
|
|
|
|
`--releasever=` number if you want to upgrade to a different system
|
|
|
|
|
release. Most people will want to upgrade to the latest stable release,
|
|
|
|
|
which is **, but if you're running Fedora , you might want to upgrade
|
|
|
|
|
just to Fedora . You can also use for upgrading to Branched or `rawhide`
|
|
|
|
|
for upgrading to Rawhide (warning: those are not stable releases).
|
|
|
|
|
* If you are upgrading to Rawhide, you will need to import the rpm gpg
|
|
|
|
|
key for it. This will be the highest numbered key version in . For
|
|
|
|
|
example if there is a Branched release that is , then you should look
|
|
|
|
|
for a , and if there is currently no Branched release, it will be .
|
|
|
|
|
\{\{#tag:pre|$ sudo rpm --import
|
|
|
|
|
/etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora--primary}}
|
|
|
|
|
5. If some of your packages have unsatisfied dependencies, the upgrade
|
|
|
|
|
will refuse to continue until you run it again with an extra option.
|
|
|
|
|
This often happens with packages installed from third-party repositories
|
|
|
|
|
for which an updated repositories hasn't been yet published. Please
|
|
|
|
|
study the output very carefully and examine which packages are going to
|
|
|
|
|
be removed. None of them should be essential for system functionality,
|
|
|
|
|
but some of them might be important for your productivity.
|
|
|
|
|
* In case of unsatisfied dependencies, you can sometimes see more
|
|
|
|
|
details if you add option to the command line.
|
|
|
|
|
* If you want to remove/install some packages manually before running
|
|
|
|
|
`dnf system-upgrade download` again, it's advisable to perform those
|
|
|
|
|
operations with `--setopt=keepcache=1` dnf command line option.
|
|
|
|
|
Otherwise the whole package cache will be removed after your operation,
|
|
|
|
|
and you'll need to download all the packages once again.
|
|
|
|
|
6. Trigger the upgrade process:
|
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
|
....
|
|
|
|
|
$ sudo dnf system-upgrade reboot
|
|
|
|
|
....
|
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
|
This will reboot your machine immediately. The system should boot again
|
|
|
|
|
into Fedora using the same kernel, but this time, the upgrade process
|
|
|
|
|
appears on the boot screen.
|
|
|
|
|
7. Wait for the upgrade process to complete.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[[frequently-asked-questions]]
|
|
|
|
|
Frequently Asked Questions
|
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[[how-do-i-report-issues-that-i-find-with-upgrades]]
|
|
|
|
|
How do I report issues that I find with upgrades?
|
|
|
|
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First see link:Common_F{{FedoraVersionNumber}}_bugs[Common
|
|
|
|
|
F\{\{FedoraVersionNumber}} bugs] or
|
|
|
|
|
link:Common_F{{FedoraVersionNumber[next}} bugs] to check if the problem
|
|
|
|
|
is a very prominent issue we already know of. If it is not there,
|
|
|
|
|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?product=Fedora&component=dnf-plugin-system-upgrade&resolution=---[search
|
|
|
|
|
for an existing bug report]. If you do not see a report that matches
|
|
|
|
|
your symptoms, you can file a new report from the search page. Please
|
|
|
|
|
follow the bug reporting instructions mentioned in
|
|
|
|
|
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf-plugin-system-upgrade[this
|
|
|
|
|
README] and in `man dnf.plugin.system-upgrade`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you hit issues after upgrade with a specific package, file a bug
|
|
|
|
|
against the package with which you are having issues.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[[does-dnf-system-upgrade-verify-the-software-it-runs-or-installs-during-upgrade]]
|
|
|
|
|
Does DNF system upgrade verify the software it runs or installs during
|
|
|
|
|
upgrade?
|
|
|
|
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes. The package signing keys for newer Fedora releases are sent to
|
|
|
|
|
older Fedora releases in order to allow DNF to verify the integrity of
|
|
|
|
|
the packages it downloads. You can disable this function with the
|
|
|
|
|
parameter if you need to do so for any reason (not recommended, you're
|
|
|
|
|
then opened to attacks from malicious software).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[[will-packages-in-third-party-repositories-be-upgraded]]
|
|
|
|
|
Will packages in third party repositories be upgraded?
|
|
|
|
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, if they are set up like regular DNF repositories and do not hard
|
|
|
|
|
code the repository path. Commonly-used third party repositories usually
|
|
|
|
|
work fine, but if you attempt to upgrade prior to or soon after an
|
|
|
|
|
official Fedora release, they may not have updated their repository
|
|
|
|
|
paths yet, and DNF may be unable to find their packages. This will
|
|
|
|
|
usually not prevent the upgrade running successfully, though, and you
|
|
|
|
|
can update the packages from the third-party repository later.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[[can-i-upgrade-from-an-end-of-life-release]]
|
|
|
|
|
Can I upgrade from an link:End_of_life[End of life] release?
|
|
|
|
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note that Fedora strongly recommends against ever running an end-of-life
|
|
|
|
|
release on any production system, or any system connected to the public
|
|
|
|
|
internet, in any circumstances. You should never allow a production
|
|
|
|
|
Fedora deployment to reach end-of-life in the first place.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With that in mind, if you do have an end-of-life release newer than
|
|
|
|
|
Fedora 20 installed on a system you cannot just discard or re-deploy,
|
|
|
|
|
you can attempt to upgrade it, though this is a less-tested and
|
|
|
|
|
less-supported operation. You can try to upgrade through intermediate
|
|
|
|
|
releases until you reach a currently-supported release, or try to
|
|
|
|
|
upgrade to a currently-supported release in a single operation. It is
|
|
|
|
|
not possible to state with certainty which approach is more likely to be
|
|
|
|
|
successful.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you attempt to upgrade across more than two releases in one
|
|
|
|
|
operation, please also read the link:#multi[next answer].
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you have Fedora 20 or earlier installed, you cannot upgrade with DNF
|
|
|
|
|
system upgrade alone. You must upgrade at least part of the way
|
|
|
|
|
link:Upgrading_Fedora_using_package_manager[using bare or ]. You can
|
|
|
|
|
either upgrade to Fedora 21 that way and then upgrade the rest of the
|
|
|
|
|
way using DNF system upgrade, or you can attempt the entire upgrade
|
|
|
|
|
using bare or . Note this method is in itself not an officially
|
|
|
|
|
recommended upgrade mechanism. To be frank, any upgrade from Fedora 20
|
|
|
|
|
or earlier is very much done 'at your own risk'.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[[how-many-releases-can-i-upgrade-across-at-once]]
|
|
|
|
|
How many releases can I upgrade across at once?
|
|
|
|
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The most common scenario is an upgrade across just one release (e.g. to
|
|
|
|
|
). However, for the first month or so after a new release comes out,
|
|
|
|
|
upgrades from the last-but-one release to that release are 'supported',
|
|
|
|
|
in the sense that we include this scenario in the
|
|
|
|
|
link:Fedora_Release_Criteria[Fedora Release Criteria], test it for at
|
|
|
|
|
least clean installs of supported package sets, and will treat bugs
|
|
|
|
|
discovered in such upgrades as significant. The
|
|
|
|
|
link:Fedora_Release_Life_Cycle[Fedora Release Life Cycle] is
|
|
|
|
|
specifically designed to provide this approximate one month 'grace
|
|
|
|
|
period' so you can choose to upgrade long-lived systems only once every
|
|
|
|
|
two releases, rather than having to do it every release.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Around a month after the new release comes out, the last-but-one release
|
|
|
|
|
goes link:End_of_life[End of life], at which point the
|
|
|
|
|
link:#eol[previous question] applies. Still, that upgrade is still
|
|
|
|
|
pretty likely to work successfully for some time after the release goes
|
|
|
|
|
end-of-life.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Upgrades across more than two releases are not 'supported', and issues
|
|
|
|
|
encountered in such upgrades may not be considered significant bugs.
|
|
|
|
|
Note that any upgrade across more than two releases must by definition
|
|
|
|
|
be an upgrade from an end-of-life release, and so the link:#eol[previous
|
|
|
|
|
question] applies here too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When upgrading across multiple releases, you may find you need to
|
|
|
|
|
link:Upgrading_Fedora_using_package_manager#packagekey[import the target
|
|
|
|
|
release package signing key manually]. Fedora releases usually only have
|
|
|
|
|
the package signing keys for the next two releases installed (because
|
|
|
|
|
they go end-of-life before the N+3 release is branched). Before Fedora
|
|
|
|
|
22, it was not consistently the case that every release had keys for the
|
|
|
|
|
next two releases, either. If dnf complains about a missing key, this is
|
|
|
|
|
what you must do.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[[can-i-use-dnf-system-upgrade-to-upgrade-to-a-pre-release-e.g.-a-beta]]
|
|
|
|
|
Can I use DNF system upgrade to upgrade to a pre-release (e.g. a Beta)?
|
|
|
|
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes. It should always be possible to attempt such an upgrade. Of course,
|
|
|
|
|
this function is as subject to temporary breakage as is any other aspect
|
|
|
|
|
of a pre-release, and generally speaking, the earlier the release in
|
|
|
|
|
question, the less likely it is to work without problems.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[[optional-post-upgrade-tasks]]
|
|
|
|
|
Optional post-upgrade tasks
|
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
These are tasks you can do after a successful upgrade. *They are mostly
|
|
|
|
|
intended for power users. If you are a general user who doesn't use
|
|
|
|
|
terminal daily, you don't need to worry about this.*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[[update-system-configuration-files]]
|
|
|
|
|
Update system configuration files
|
|
|
|
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Most configuration files are stored in `/etc`. If there are any updates
|
|
|
|
|
to them and you touched some of those files before, RPM creates new
|
|
|
|
|
files with either `.rpmnew` suffix (the new default config file), or
|
|
|
|
|
`.rpmsave` suffix (your old config file backed up). You can search for
|
|
|
|
|
these files, go through the changes and make sure your custom changes
|
|
|
|
|
are still included and the new defaults are applied as well. A tool that
|
|
|
|
|
tried to simplify this is . Install the package, and then use it as:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
`$ sudo rpmconf -a`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See more information in its manual page.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[[clean-up-old-packages]]
|
|
|
|
|
Clean up old packages
|
|
|
|
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You can see list of packages with broken dependencies like this:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
`$ sudo dnf repoquery --unsatisfied`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ideally there should be none. If there are some, consider removing them,
|
|
|
|
|
because they are not likely to work properly anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You can see duplicated packages (packages with multiple versions
|
|
|
|
|
installed) like this:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
`$ sudo dnf repoquery --duplicated`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For ordinary packages, just the latest version should be installed. But
|
|
|
|
|
there can be exceptions to the rule, only remove what you are sure you
|
|
|
|
|
no longer need.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Some packages might stay on your system while they have been removed
|
|
|
|
|
from the repositories. See them using:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
`$ sudo dnf list extras`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you don't use these, you can consider removing them:
|
|
|
|
|
`dnf remove $(dnf repoquery --extras --exclude=kernel,kernel-\*)`.
|
|
|
|
|
Please note that this list is only valid if you have a fully updated
|
|
|
|
|
system. Otherwise you'll see all installed packages which are no longer
|
|
|
|
|
in the repositories, because there is a newer update available. So
|
|
|
|
|
before acting on these, make sure you have run `sudo dnf update` and
|
|
|
|
|
generate the list of extra packages again. Also, this list might contain
|
|
|
|
|
packages installed from third-party repositories for which an updated
|
|
|
|
|
repository hasn't been published yet. This often involves e.g. RPM
|
|
|
|
|
Fusion or Dropbox.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You can remove no-longer-needed packages using:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
`$ sudo dnf autoremove`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
but *beware* that dnf decides that a package is no longer needed if you
|
|
|
|
|
haven't explicitly asked to install it and nothing else requires it.
|
|
|
|
|
That doesn't mean that package is not useful or that you don't use it.
|
|
|
|
|
*Only remove what you are certain you don't need*. There's a known bug
|
|
|
|
|
in PackageKit which doesn't mark packages as user-installed, see
|
|
|
|
|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259865[bug 1259865]. If you
|
|
|
|
|
use PackageKit (or GNOME Software, Apper, etc) for installation, this
|
|
|
|
|
output might list even important apps and system packages, so beware.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[[resolving-post-upgrade-issues]]
|
|
|
|
|
Resolving post-upgrade issues
|
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*Only follow up these steps if you have troubles with your upgraded
|
|
|
|
|
system. It should not be needed in the vast majority of upgrades.*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[[rebuilding-rpm-database]]
|
|
|
|
|
Rebuilding RPM database
|
|
|
|
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you see warnings when working with RPM/DNF tools, your database might
|
|
|
|
|
have gotten corrupted for some reason. It is possible to rebuild it and
|
|
|
|
|
see if resolves your issues. Always back up `/var/lib/rpm/` first. To
|
|
|
|
|
rebuild the database, run:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
`$ sudo rpm --rebuilddb`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[[using-distro-sync-to-resolve-dependency-issues]]
|
|
|
|
|
Using distro-sync to resolve dependency issues
|
|
|
|
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The system upgrade tool uses distro-sync method by default. If your
|
|
|
|
|
system stayed partly unupgraded or you see some package dependency
|
|
|
|
|
issues, you might try to fix it by running another distro-sync manually.
|
|
|
|
|
This tries to make your installed packages exactly the same version as
|
|
|
|
|
in currently enabled repositories, even if it meant downgrading some
|
|
|
|
|
packages:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
`$ sudo dnf distro-sync`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A stronger variant also allows to remove package for which package
|
|
|
|
|
dependencies can't be satisfied. Always carefully review which packages
|
|
|
|
|
are going to be removed before confirming this:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
`$ sudo dnf distro-sync --allowerasing`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[[relabel-files-with-latest-selinux-policy]]
|
|
|
|
|
Relabel files with latest SELinux policy
|
|
|
|
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you see warnings that some actions were not allowed because of
|
|
|
|
|
current SELinux policy, it might be a case of having some files
|
|
|
|
|
incorrectly label with SELinux permissions. This might happen in case of
|
|
|
|
|
some bug or if you had SELinux disabled in some point of time in the
|
|
|
|
|
past. You can relabel the whole system by running:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
`$ sudo touch /.autorelabel`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and rebooting. The next boot will take a long time and will check and
|
|
|
|
|
fix all SELinux labels on all your files.
|
|
|
|
|
'''
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See a typo, something missing or out of date, or anything else which can be
|
|
|
|
|
improved? Edit this document at https://pagure.io/fedora-docs/fedora-howto.
|